![]() ![]() With this proposal, the Navy signals that it will not exercise the option for a tenth Block V submarine–a decision that directly contradicts the National Defense Strategy and inexplicably delays the Navy’s goal of reaching 66 fast-attack submarines by 2048. We write to express our concern regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 budget request, which includes only $4.9 billion in full procurement funding for the Virginia Class program. ![]() And so we are looking for any opportunity to accelerate that.” And that situation will get worse before it gets better. In the letter, the senators asked for additional information from the Navy to justify the proposed submarine fleet reduction, citing Assistant Secretary Geurts’ testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee in March 2019, which warned: “Our biggest shortfall…is in attack submarines. Chris Murphy, D-Ct., Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, Jack Reed, D-RI, Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisc., Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI, Lindsey Graham, R-SC, Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., Maggie Hassan, D-NH, Mark Warner, D-Va., Bob Casey, D-Penn., Tim Kaine, D-Va., Roger Wicker, R-Miss., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo. The Navy’s FY 2021 budget request does not include funding for a tenth Block V submarine which, as the senators note in their letter, “directly contradicts the National Defense Strategy and inexplicably delays the Navy’s goal of reaching 66 fast-attack submarines by 2048.”Īdditional signers include U.S. Thomas Modly over proposed acquisition shortfalls in fiscal year (FY) 2021 for the Virginia Class submarine program, which could negatively impact both the United States’ undersea superiority and the submarine industrial base. Senate colleagues in raising concerns with Acting U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |